Meta Knowledge/ Knowledge Calculus - classification of Action Research
Source: http://b4gen.blogspot.com/2017/03/fearsome-past-of-faith-and-scientific.html
FEARSOME PAST OF FAITH AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH MINDSETS- HOW FUTURE!
Authored by J. Ashraf,
sun_education@yahoo.com, Sept 10, 2008
PREAMBLE
Why faith oriented (Islam -
a case) closed contours are characteristically back benchers in setting trends
of global research and development? The young generation of the time (not old
guards’ whose thought
process renounces and
lost in faith
coated interpretations of specific events generation after generation –
see Elaborations below) is naturally directed to admonish in-depth the
intrinsic passive influences of the past, and is ready to turnaround whilst
exploding the shabby deadlock. This may likely to breed the new form of faith
and science on a perpetual track without conflicting with virtual precisions of
global standards. Notably, the pointed change may go a long way to enrich and
construe knowledge engineering classics; skills and tools.
Thematically, the classics is
not a pre-empting physical characteristic dimension, rather virtuosity ‘truth
and false’ as a foundation of research, an ongoing dissertation; ‘between any
two predicates there is a predicates’, demands analytical exploration free from self motivated urges
and obstructions. Nevertheless,
these fundamental causes have suffocated the opened research capabilities of
faith oriented mindsets’.
Why these capabilities may not
be revisited and substantiated at meta-levels for bidding their fertile mind
in Science & Technology with the pace of time- like
holy war crusade?
Secondly, for an ambitious
student of knowledge engineering raised on analytics of faith (Muslim) arena,
the well-formed blueprints (wfb) in precise and discrete mode are not commonly
available. So, how the incumbents should configure preferences of formal calculus
of thoughts’ pruning (natural offering without faith filtering) or genesis
inline with the wfb and often stand in arbitrary zone? Rephrasing, the
inscribed subtleness of the issues of human thought engine in state-of-the art
perspectives, and traversing them on pragmatics faith and science relationship,
as they shouldn’t be nullifying mutually. Thus, how to resolve this virtual
latch of faith and science truth! A bail out from the stagnancy
of idles leading to
progressive path of result oriented global advancements for promotion of
meta-knowledge, while smarten up our axiomatic mirroring of native past
successes and stand again competent in the modern science and technology
challenges.
Thirdly, are we the lost
guys, if so, where we got lost in classics or tactics adventurism and how
priorities for human development extra prejudices of faith under umbrella of ‘Syllogism’
and ‘Analogies’ deviated from the
flourishing corridor of
science and technology? Indeed,
the explicit faith deliverables are intangible fitting to the premises of purification
of thoughts philosophy, while
science stands on
tangibles short lived
or otherwise. The over dominance of
faith pursuits culminated
the inconsistency and indulged variant forms of self notions
mostly based on weaker logical forms. The inward exclusiveness of faith ride
often divulges against the truth deducted by logical forms or natural gifted
truth. Since, the horizon of the debate directed integrated global rationales are
inclusive of past, present and future of assertions, what research proceeds
demand, manifestation of calculus of interaction of faith and science at least
for dunk mindsets on the track of intellect thrives.
itically, the time is running fast on a non loyal course for closed
contours of exclusive
faith oriented wisdom without a discrete wfb. It is going off on the
side of the cruelly
unbridgeable polarization of ‘Know’ and ‘Do Not Know’ of faith
similarity and fuzzy affinity
of the realm of Science and Technology respectively.
Note; The efforts in fostering
renaissance in this respect by Pervez Hoodbhy (1) is a
bootstrap attempt and may be debated at large to converge on prescribing
discrete wfb
as respected guideline.
ritically, the time is running fast on a non loyal course for closed
contours of exclusive
faith oriented wisdom without a discrete wfb. It is going off on the
side of the cruelly
unbridgeable polarization of ‘Know’ and ‘Do Not Know’ of faith
similarity and fuzzy affinity
of the realm of Science and Technology respectively.
Note; The efforts in fostering
renaissance in this respect by Pervez Hoodbhy (1) is a
bootstrap attempt and may be debated at large to converge on prescribing
discrete wfb
as respected guideline.
Critically, the time is running fast on a non loyal course for closed
contours of exclusive
faith oriented wisdom without a discrete wfb. It is going off on the
side of the cruelly
unbridgeable polarization of ‘Know’ and ‘Do Not Know’ of faith
similarity and fuzzy affinity
of the realm of Science and Technology respectively.
Note; The efforts in fostering
renaissance in this respect by Pervez Hoodbhy (1) is a
bootstrap attempt and may be debated at large to converge on prescribing
discrete wfb
as respected guideline.
ELABORATIONS
1. By word of mouth commandments of older generations of Muslims of
British India
a notion of wfb; ‘Mathematics (synonym of arithmetic) is a subject of
learning for
business castes of
India society, hence
not for Muslims’,
the then Muslim
educational system took note of it. Why it was so?
2. The faith promoters
hardly ever cultivated
the research and
development
constituting as constructor of holy war crusades dealing with virtuosity
objects;
intellect, brainpower, knowledge, randomness etc and the faith followers
did not
pursue being un-prescribed wfb.
3. The faith discourse
hardly disregard the
logical forms like;
Boolean, fuzzy,
default, temporal, spatial
etc, the ignorance
bitterly influenced their
routine
application tools, guidance mining in historical books because the
evolution of
human intellect is ever and ever stochastic, i.e. and not curbed by the
faith bond
elucidations.
4. Now days, the
information highways provide
tremendous opportunities of
knowledge engineering concrete rhythms; continuum events and facts
within the
logical coherence of
thought pruning. Within
the faith domains,
the serial
intricacies of assertions often fall short of deductions as evident
truth, and end on
default fallacies in global presumptions. Thus, to defend that drawback,
the faith
veils iron curtain of prejudices and hatch engine of mental militancy
resulting into
physical fundamentalism against the course of analyzing biases; ‘ignorance
is
blessing’ contents their mind anxiety. More so, on mining the legacy of
thought
calculus, the review beats points their delusion which were manifested
by faith
practitioners as inscribed genetic flow to creativity delusions- a case
5) below.
5. Some of the references in line with the item 4 above are;
‘The most influential
figure was the
philosopher Abu Hamid
Al-Ghazali, who
argues in The Coherence of The Philosophers against the very idea of laws of
nature, on the
ground that any
such laws would
put God’s hand
in chains.
Mathematics and Arithmetic, in Al-Ghazali’s view
are ‘exact sciences
with no
connection with metaphysical or religious principles.’
Such discourse of
influential philosophers fostered
impression on Muslim
researchers to ignore these meta-skills, generation and after
generation. As a
result we are
drowned in affinity
of ‘do not
know’ black hole
of knowledge
treasures. Is it not the point and time reversion of those genies?
Quote from reference (3);
Critically, the time is running
fast on a non loyal course for closed contours of exclusive
faith oriented wisdom without a discrete wfb. It is going off on the
side of the cruelly
unbridgeable polarization of ‘Know’ and ‘Do Not Know’ of faith
similarity and fuzzy affinity
of the realm of Science and Technology respectively.
Note; The efforts in fostering
renaissance in this respect by Pervez Hoodbhy (1) is a
bootstrap attempt and may be debated at large to converge on prescribing
discrete wfb
as respected guideline.
Critically, the time is running fast on a non loyal course for closed
contours of exclusive
faith oriented wisdom without a discrete wfb. It is going off on the
side of the cruelly
unbridgeable polarization of ‘Know’ and ‘Do Not Know’ of faith
similarity and fuzzy affinity
of the realm of Science and Technology respectively.
Note; The efforts in fostering
renaissance in this respect by Pervez Hoodbhy (1) is a
bootstrap attempt and may be debated at large to converge on prescribing
discrete wfb
as respected guideline
Critically, the time is running fast on a non loyal course for closed
contours of exclusive
faith oriented wisdom without a discrete wfb. It is going off on the
side of the cruelly
unbridgeable polarization of ‘Know’ and ‘Do Not Know’ of faith
similarity and fuzzy affinity
of the realm of Science and Technology respectively.
Note; The efforts in fostering
renaissance in this respect by Pervez Hoodbhy (1) is a
bootstrap attempt and may be debated at large to converge on prescribing
discrete wfb
as respected guideline.
Critically, the time is running fast on a non loyal course for closed
contours of exclusive
faith oriented wisdom without a discrete wfb. It is going off on the
side of the cruelly
unbridgeable polarization of ‘Know’ and ‘Do Not Know’ of faith
similarity and fuzzy affinity
of the realm of Science and Technology respectively.
Note; The efforts in fostering
renaissance in this respect by Pervez Hoodbhy (1) is a
bootstrap attempt and may be debated at large to converge on prescribing
discrete wfb
as respected guideline.
Critically, the time is
running fast on a non-loyal course for closed contours of exclusive faith
oriented wisdom without a discrete wfb. It is going off on the side of the
cruelly unbridgeable polarization of ‘Know’ and ‘Do Not Know’ of faith
similarity and fuzzy affinity of the realm of Science and Technology
respectively.
Note; The efforts in
fostering renaissance in this respect by Pervez Hoodbhoy (1) is a bootstrap
attempt and may be debated at large to converge on prescribing discrete wfb as
respected guideline
ELABORATIONS
1. By word of mouth
commandments of older generations of Muslims of British India, a notion of wfb;
‘Mathematics (synonym of arithmetic) is a subject of learning for business castes
of India society, hence not
for Muslims’, the then
Muslim educational system took note of it. Why it was so?
2. The faith
promoters hardly ever
cultivated the research
and development constituting as
constructor of holy war crusades dealing with followers did not pursue being
un-prescribed wfb.
3. The faith
discourse hardly disregard
the logical
forms like; Boolean, fuzzy, default, temporal,
spatial etc, the ignorance
bitterly influenced their
routine application tools, guidance mining in historical books because
the evolution of human intellect is ever and ever stochastic, i.e. and not
curbed by the faith bond elucidations. 4. Now
days, the information highways
provide tremendous opportunities of knowledge engineering concrete rhythms;
continuum events and facts within the logical
coherence of thought
pruning. Within the
faith domains, the serial intricacies
of assertions often fall short of deductions as evident truth, and end on default
fallacies in global presumptions. Thus, to defend that drawback, the faith
veils iron curtain of prejudices and hatch engine of mental militancy resulting
in to physical fundamentalism against the course of analyzing biases;
‘ignorance is blessing’ contents their mind anxiety.
More so, on mining the
legacy of thought calculus, the review beats point their delusion which were
manifested by faith practitioners as inscribed genetic flow to creativity
delusions- a case 5) below.
5. Some of the references
in line with the item
4 above are; ‘The most influential
figure was the philosopher Abu Hamid
Al-Ghazali, who argues in The Coherence of The Philosophers against the
very idea of laws of nature, on
the ground that
any such laws
would put God’s
hand in chains. Mathematics and Arithmetic, in Al-Ghazali’s
view are ‘exact
sciences with no connection with metaphysical or religious
principles.’ Such discourse of
influential philosophers fostered
impression on Muslim researchers to ignore these
meta-skills, generation and after generation. As a result we
are drowned in
affinity of ‘do not
know’ black hole
of knowledge treasures. Is it
not the point and time reversion of those genies? Quote from reference
(3);
Critically, the time is running fast on a non loyal course for closed
contours of exclusive
faith oriented wisdom without a discrete wfb. It is going off on the
side of the cruelly
unbridgeable polarization of ‘Know’ and ‘Do Not Know’ of faith
similarity and fuzzy affinity
of the realm of Science and Technology respectively.
Note; The efforts in fostering
renaissance in this respect by Pervez Hoodbhy (1) is a
bootstrap attempt and may be debated at large to converge on prescribing
discrete wfb
as respected guideline.
ELABORATIONS
1. By word of mouth commandments of older generations of Muslims of
British India
a notion of wfb; ‘Mathematics (synonym of arithmetic) is a subject of
learning for
business castes of
India society, hence
not for Muslims’,
the then Muslim
educational system took note of it. Why it was so?
2. The faith promoters
hardly ever cultivated
the research and
development
constituting as constructor of holy war crusades dealing with virtuosity
objects;
intellect, brainpower, knowledge, randomness etc and the faith followers
did not
pursue being un-prescribed wfb.
3. The faith discourse
hardly disregard the
logical forms like;
Boolean, fuzzy,
default, temporal, spatial
etc, the ignorance
bitterly influenced their
routine
application tools, guidance mining in historical books because the
evolution of
human intellect is ever and ever stochastic, i.e. and not curbed by the
faith bond
elucidations.
4. Now days, the
information highways provide
tremendous opportunities of
knowledge engineering concrete rhythms; continuum events and facts
within the
logical coherence of
thought pruning. Within
the faith domains,
the serial
intricacies of assertions often fall short of deductions as evident
truth, and end on
default fallacies in global presumptions. Thus, to defend that drawback,
the faith
veils iron curtain of prejudices and hatch engine of mental militancy
resulting into
physical fundamentalism against the course of analyzing biases; ‘ignorance
is
blessing’ contents their mind anxiety. More so, on mining the legacy of
thought
calculus, the review beats points their delusion which were manifested
by faith
practitioners as inscribed genetic flow to creativity delusions- a case
5) below.
5. Some of the references in line with the item 4 above are;
‘The most influential
figure was the
philosopher Abu Hamid
Al-Ghazali, who
argues in The Coherence of The Philosophers against the very idea of laws of
nature, on the
ground that any
such laws would
put God’s hand
in chains.
Mathematics and Arithmetic, in Al-Ghazali’s view
are ‘exact sciences
with no
connection with metaphysical or religious principles.’
Such discourse of
influential philosophers fostered
impression on Muslim
researchers to ignore these meta-skills, generation and after
generation. As a
result we are
drowned in affinity
of ‘do not
know’ black hole
of knowledge
treasures. Is it not the point and time reversion of those genies?
Quote from reference (3);
Critically, the
time is running fast on a non loyal course for closed contours of exclusive
faith oriented
wisdom without a discrete wfb. It is going off on the side of the cruelly
unbridgeable
polarization of ‘Know’ and ‘Do Not Know’ of faith similarity and
fuzzy affinity
of the realm of
Science and Technology respectively.
Note; The efforts in fostering renaissance in this
respect by Pervez Hoodbhy (1) is a
bootstrap
attempt and may be debated at large to converge on prescribing discrete wfb
as respected
guideline.
ELABORATIONS
1. By word of
mouth commandments of older generations of Muslims of British India
a notion of
wfb; ‘Mathematics
(synonym of arithmetic) is a subject of learning for
business castes
of India society,
hence not for
Muslims’, the
then Muslim
educational
system took note of it. Why it was so?
2. The faith
promoters hardly ever
cultivated the research
and development
constituting as
constructor of holy war crusades dealing with virtuosity objects;
intellect,
brainpower, knowledge, randomness etc and the faith followers did not
pursue being
un-prescribed wfb.
3. The faith
discourse hardly disregard
the logical forms
like; Boolean, fuzzy,
default, temporal,
spatial etc, the
ignorance bitterly influenced
their routine
application
tools, guidance mining in historical books because the evolution of
human intellect
is ever and ever stochastic, i.e. and not curbed by the faith bond
elucidations.
4. Now days,
the information highways
provide tremendous opportunities of
knowledge
engineering concrete rhythms; continuum events and facts within the
logical coherence
of thought pruning.
Within the faith
domains, the serial
intricacies of
assertions often fall short of deductions as evident truth, and end on
default
fallacies in global presumptions. Thus, to defend that drawback, the faith
veils iron curtain
of prejudices and hatch engine of mental militancy resulting into
physical
fundamentalism against the course of analyzing biases; ‘ignorance is
blessing’ contents their mind
anxiety. More so, on mining the legacy of thought
calculus, the
review beats points their delusion which were manifested by faith
practitioners
as inscribed genetic flow to creativity delusions- a case 5) below.
5. Some of the
references in line with the item 4 above are;
‘The most
influential figure was
the philosopher Abu
Hamid Al-Ghazali, who
argues in The Coherence of The
Philosophers against the
very idea of laws of
nature, on
the ground that
any such laws
would put God’s
hand in chains.
Mathematics and Arithmetic, in Al-Ghazali’s view
are ‘exact sciences
with no
connection with
metaphysical or religious principles.’
Such discourse
of influential philosophers fostered
impression on Muslim
researchers to
ignore these meta-skills, generation and after generation. As a
result we
are drowned in
affinity of ‘do not know’
black hole of
knowledge
treasures. Is
it not the point and time reversion of those genies?
Quote from
reference (3);
“Muslims enjoyed a remarkable ascendancy in
science for about five centuries,
an ascendancy
that was unrivalled by any contemporary civilization. Second
science has now
dwindled to frighteningly low stand in the Muslim world and
there is a
critical need to rescue the Muslim culture from complete intellectual
annihilation that
science and Islam
are compatible. Over
and above these
fundamental
agreements, there is considerable dispute. …”
Reference (1);
Pervez Hoodhboy
The
state-of-the art Meta thinkers now boldly reproaching to analytic pros
and cons on
sermons of axis of ignorance of faith followers through out to-
date, in their
expressions on catastrophic conflicts; Religious orthodoxy and
Rational of
Science & Technology, ‘Islam and Science; Religious Orthodoxy
and the Battle
for Rationality.’
Quote from
Reference (2); George Salibah, expressed an account of impetus of
embedding
ancient Greek sciences into the faith (Islam) oriented philosopher’s
mindset.
‘According
to the post-philosopher, science
flourishing in the
Islamic
civilization marked an
all out revolt
against Greek thought.
In the book
Islamic
Science and Making
of the European Renaissance
(reviewed in
Books and
Authors, Jan 13, 2008), George Salibah also knows with several
historical
evidences that unique juridical requirements of the Islamic fiqah
provided the
main thrust to the development of the exact sciences.’
6. The philosopher
Abu Hamid Al-Ghazali,
argues in The
Coherence of the
Philosophers against the very idea of Mathematics and
arithmetic. In his view
these are
exact sciences with
no relationship with
metaphysical or religious
principles
(independent dimension).
7. The present-day
perception of Science
and Mathematics utilizes
logical
reasoning to
specify Relationship of
Physical and Virtual Objects,
while Faith
Assertions are
not regulated so. The faith is not presided over by reasons alone,
these marvels
of wisdom immersed in heart and often not in mind, as inseparable
blend.
8.
Additionally: The natural evolution process following logical phenomena is duly
affecting to
every one who ever breaths in this solar system. A propositional truth
of logical
algebra of ‘Do not know’ is in default. A transformation from ‘Know’ to
‘Do not know’
is a real struggle for knowledge at any point and time. The ‘know’
gets bigger and
so ‘Do not know’ being infinity in totality.
A thought bond order is
clean slate on
birth, the attributes he possessed (may be AL-Ghazali or Khayyam
or others)
are natural gift,
there is nothing
which he owns
any tangible or
intangible
objects- its elucidation is left open.
“Muslims enjoyed a remarkable
ascendancy in science for about five
Critically, the
time is running fast on a non loyal course for closed contours of exclusive
faith oriented
wisdom without a discrete wfb. It is going off on the side of the cruelly
unbridgeable
polarization of ‘Know’ and ‘Do Not Know’ of faith similarity and
fuzzy affinity
of the realm of
Science and Technology respectively.
Note; The efforts in fostering renaissance in this
respect by Pervez Hoodbhy (1) is a
bootstrap
attempt and may be debated at large to converge on prescribing discrete wfb
as respected
guideline.
ELABORATIONS
1. By word of
mouth commandments of older generations of Muslims of British India
a notion of
wfb; ‘Mathematics
(synonym of arithmetic) is a subject of learning for
business castes
of India society,
hence not for
Muslims’, the
then Muslim
educational
system took note of it. Why it was so?
2. The faith
promoters hardly ever
cultivated the research
and development
constituting as
constructor of holy war crusades dealing with virtuosity objects;
intellect,
brainpower, knowledge, randomness etc and the faith followers did not
pursue being
un-prescribed wfb.
3. The faith
discourse hardly disregard
the logical forms
like; Boolean, fuzzy,
default, temporal,
spatial etc, the
ignorance bitterly influenced
their routine
application
tools, guidance mining in historical books because the evolution of
human intellect
is ever and ever stochastic, i.e. and not curbed by the faith bond
elucidations.
4. Now days,
the information highways
provide tremendous opportunities of
knowledge
engineering concrete rhythms; continuum events and facts within the
logical coherence
of thought pruning.
Within the faith
domains, the serial
intricacies of
assertions often fall short of deductions as evident truth, and end on
default
fallacies in global presumptions. Thus, to defend that drawback, the faith
veils iron
curtain of prejudices and hatch engine of mental militancy resulting into
physical
fundamentalism against the course of analyzing biases; ‘ignorance is
blessing’ contents their mind
anxiety. More so, on mining the legacy of thought
calculus, the
review beats points their delusion which were manifested by faith
practitioners
as inscribed genetic flow to creativity delusions- a case 5) below.
5. Some of the
references in line with the item 4 above are;
‘The most
influential figure was
the philosopher Abu
Hamid Al-Ghazali, who
argues in The Coherence of The
Philosophers against the
very idea of laws of
nature, on
the ground that
any such laws
would put God’s
hand in chains.
Mathematics and Arithmetic, in Al-Ghazali’s view
are ‘exact sciences with no
connection with
metaphysical or religious principles.’
Such discourse
of influential philosophers fostered
impression on Muslim
researchers to
ignore these meta-skills, generation and after generation. As a
result we
are drowned in
affinity of ‘do not know’
black hole of
knowledge
treasures. Is
it not the point and time reversion of those genies?
Quote from
reference (3);
“Muslims enjoyed a
remarkable ascendancy in science for about five centuries,
an ascendancy that was
unrivalled by any contemporary civilization. Second science has now dwindled to
frighteningly low stand in the Muslim world and
there is a critical need to
rescue the Muslim culture from complete intellectual
annihilation that
science and Islam
are compatible. Over
and above these fundamental agreements, there is
considerable dispute. …”
Reference (1); Pervez
Hoodhbhoy
The state-of-the art Meta
thinkers now boldly reproaching to analytic pros
and cons on sermons of axis
of ignorance of faith followers through out to-
date, in their expressions
on catastrophic conflicts; Religious orthodoxy and
Rational of Science &
Technology, ‘Islam and Science; Religious Orthodoxy
and the Battle for
Rationality.’
Quote from Reference (2);
George Salibah, expressed an account of impetus of
embedding ancient Greek
sciences into the faith (Islam) oriented philosopher’s
mindset.
‘According
to the
post-philosopher, science
flourishing in the
Islamic
civilization marked an
all out revolt against Greek’s thought. In the book, of
Islamic Science and Making
of the European Renaissance (reviewed in
Books and Authors, Jan 13,
2008), George Salibah also knows with several
historical evidences that
unique juridical requirements of the Islamic fiqah
provided the main thrust to
the development of the exact sciences.’
6. The philosopher
Abu Hamid Al-Ghazali, argues in “The Coherence
of the Philosophers” against the very idea of Mathematics and
arithmetic. In his view these are
exact sciences with
no relationship with
metaphysical or religious principles (independent
dimension).
7. The present-day
perception of Science
and Mathematics utilizes
logical reasoning to specify Relationship of Physical and Virtual Objects,
while Faith Assertions are not
regulated so. The faith is not presided over by reasons alone, these marvels of
wisdom immersed in heart and often not in mind, as inseparable blend.
8. Additionally: The
natural evolution process following logical phenomena is duly affecting to
every one who ever breaths in this solar system. A propositional truth of
logical algebra of ‘Do not know’ is in default. A transformation from ‘Know’ to
‘Do not know’ is a real struggle for knowledge at any point and time. The
‘know’ gets bigger and so ‘Do not know’ being infinity in totality. A thought bond order is clean slate on birth,
the attributes he possessed (may be AL-Ghazali or Khayyam or others) are natural
gift, there is nothing which he owns
any tangible or intangible objects- its elucidation is left open.
SEAMLESS REFURBISHMENT OF
LOST KNOWLEDGE & RESEARCH
After the Al-Ghazali’ era
there was no worth significance of science (because that was not duly sponsored
by faith peers. That axis of iniquity towards science is inscribed as supreme
directive to certain faith oriented disciples.
Consequently, the above
marked items 1) to 7) taken as mandatory for researchers of faith mindset. What
a tremendous obligation was disowned and now this generation should abridge the
so created natural 3 gaps.
In simple words, endeavors of rapid growth
knowledge incubators for seamless
refurbishment of lost
genies. The pre-philosopher’s era was formless on the precisions of meta-laws,
and the post philosopher era was dominated by the veto directives, more so paid
cost of the prejudices, even distorted faith into cults of ‘believers’ and ‘non
believers’ of science and technology.
To catch on the back, log a
crusade (holy war) at genie level is imminent for invalidating expedition of
reversely culmination of native ignorance (‘do not know’) of science and
technology. These accomplishments in
rapid mode are possible by inscribing an antedate meta-faith engine
regulating human intelligence. Since the process of evolution of acumen is
acquired through tangible and intangible cross points of human intellect.
The absorption strength of
the state-of-the art human faculties of knowledge articulation is advanced too
than their ancient cousins, while competently
employing tools of interacting
(in no time) with well formed knowledge warehouses artifacts in-routine.
AS A FINAL POINT
The wfb manifest enforcement
may tie the knots of faith and research rational to fulfill the immense demand towards conscious awakening of heart and mind and insuring apprehensions of
both. This eccentricity
may inflict a leap forward
to crusade the hesitation of faith and scientific
mindsets by integrated efforts, both pertaining together.
So, the birth of
state-of-the art generation will break through the fear of conflict legacy while
projecting on science and technology research deficits.
Author suggests a motto to
inscribe in heart and mind, ‘Faith, and Scientific Research for All’ a
clear-cut way forward while boosting the campaign and joining global research club
of science and technology for ongoing expeditions of the valuable Laws of
Nature to mankind.
REFERENCES
(1). Pervez Hoodbhoy, Islam
and Science: Religious Orthodoxy and the Battle for
Rationality (Zed books, London
1991).
(2). George Salibah, In the
book Islamic Science and Making of the European
Renaissance (reviewed in the DAWN, Books
and Authors, Jan 13, 2008).
(3). Sabih Anwar, ‘An
Ongoing Debate’, the DAWN, Books and Authors, 31
St August, 2008, pp
6-7.
NOTE: This article is posted
on; http://suneducation.googlepages.com/mainpage
on Sep 10, 08, here it is reposting.
No comments:
Post a Comment