IRAN ON BRINK OF NUCLEAR BOMB IN SIX-SEVEN MONTHS: Netanyahu By Spetalnick & William
COMMENTS
This is an Action research Forum of public wisdom;
Forum wishes the time gap to seconds to accomplish as per their diehard efforts, Let Netanyahu burst out to pursue the Mayan’s predictions. “Drums are not blown up by crows cries” . Iranians should do what is in their minds for world peace, Netanyahu is not the master of the world communities, and should come to ground of rationality instead threats and attacks mindset.
****
IRAN ON BRINK OF NUCLEAR BOMB IN SIX-SEVEN MONTHS: Netanyahu By Spetalnick & William
Source: http://news.yahoo.com/iran-six-seven-months-nuclear-bomb-capability-netanyahu-132523940.html
Iran on brink of nuclear bomb in six-seven months: Netanyahu
By Matt Spetalnick and Dan Williams | Reuters – 15 mins ago
WASHINGTON/JERUSALEM (Reuters) – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned on Sunday that Iran was just six to seven months away from being able to build a nuclear bomb, adding urgency to his demand that President Barack Obama set a clear “red line” for Tehran in what could deepen the worst U.S.-Israeli rift in decades.
Taking to the television airwaves to make his case directly to the American public, Netanyahu said that by mid-2013 Iran would be 90 percent of the way toward enough enriched uranium for a weapon. He again urged the United States to spell out limits that Tehran must not cross if it is to avoid military action – something Obama has refused to do.
“You have to place that red line before them now, before it’s too late,” Netanyahu said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” program, adding that such a U.S. move could reduce the chances of having to attack Iran’s nuclear sites.
The unusually public dispute between close allies – coupled with Obama’s decision not to meet with Netanyahu later this month – has exposed a gaping U.S.-Israeli divide and stepped up pressure on the U.S. leader in the final stretch of a tight presidential election campaign.
It was the clearest marker Netanyahu has laid down so far on why he has become so strident in his push for Washington to confront Tehran with a strict ultimatum. At the same time, his approach seemed certain to stoke further tensions with Obama, with whom he has had a notoriously testy relationship.
Senior U.S. officials say Iran has yet to decide on a nuclear “breakout” – a final rush to assemble components for a bomb – and they express high confidence that it is still at least a year away from the capacity to build one if it wanted to. This contrasts with Netanyahu’s timetable, although the Israeli leader stopped short of saying Iran had decided to manufacture a weapon.
Netanyahu showed no signs of backing down on Sunday and equated the danger of a nuclear-armed Iran with the Islamist fury that fueled attacks on U.S. embassies across the Muslim world last week and shocked many Americans.
Netanyahu showed no signs of backing down on Sunday and equated the danger of a nuclear-armed Iran with the Islamist fury that fueled attacks on U.S. embassies across the Muslim world last week and shocked many Americans.
“It’s the same fanaticism that you see storming your embassies today. You want these fanatics to have nuclear weapons?” Netanyahu asked in the NBC interview, in a clear emotional appeal to Americans still reeling from the angry protests sparked by a film that mocked the Prophet Mohammad.
There have been no accusations, however, of any Iranian role in stoking the violence that has swept Muslim capitals from the Middle East to Africa in the past week.
‘IN THE RED ZONE’
‘IN THE RED ZONE’
Netanyahu argued that a credible U.S. ultimatum was needed to curb Iran, which denies it is seeking a nuclear bomb.
“They’re in the ‘red zone,'” Netanyahu said, using an American football metaphor that describes when a team is close to scoring a touchdown. “You can’t let them cross that goal line … because that would have unbelievable consequences.”
But Susan Rice, Obama’s U.N. envoy, offered no sign that Obama – who has asked Netanyahu to hold off on any strike on Iran’s nuclear sites to give sanctions and diplomacy time to work – intended to soften his resistance to red lines.
“They’re in the ‘red zone,'” Netanyahu said, using an American football metaphor that describes when a team is close to scoring a touchdown. “You can’t let them cross that goal line … because that would have unbelievable consequences.”
But Susan Rice, Obama’s U.N. envoy, offered no sign that Obama – who has asked Netanyahu to hold off on any strike on Iran’s nuclear sites to give sanctions and diplomacy time to work – intended to soften his resistance to red lines.
“We will take no option off the table to ensure that (Iran) does not acquire a nuclear weapon, including a military option,” Rice told “Meet the Press,” reiterating Obama’s longstanding position but insisting “they are not there yet.”
Israeli leaders, who see Iran’s nuclear advances as a looming threat, have made clear they are operating on a far tighter window than the United States, with a superpower’s mighty conventional arsenal at its disposal.
Asked whether Israel was closer to acting on its own, Netanyahu said: “We always reserve the right to act. But I think that if we are able to coordinate together a common position, we increase the chances that neither one of us will have to act.”
Obama, seeking re-election in November, has faced criticism from Republican presidential rival Mitt Romney that the president is being too tough with Israel and not tough enough with Iran.
Israeli leaders, who see Iran’s nuclear advances as a looming threat, have made clear they are operating on a far tighter window than the United States, with a superpower’s mighty conventional arsenal at its disposal.
Asked whether Israel was closer to acting on its own, Netanyahu said: “We always reserve the right to act. But I think that if we are able to coordinate together a common position, we increase the chances that neither one of us will have to act.”
Obama, seeking re-election in November, has faced criticism from Republican presidential rival Mitt Romney that the president is being too tough with Israel and not tough enough with Iran.
Netanyahu’s sharpened rhetoric in recent days had stoked speculation that Israel might attack Iran before the U.S. election, believing that Obama would give it military help and not risk alienating pro-Israeli voters.
Netanyahu has drawn criticism at home for overplaying his hand. He faces divisions within the Israeli public and his own government that will make it hard to launch a unilateral strike any time soon.
Netanyahu has drawn criticism at home for overplaying his hand. He faces divisions within the Israeli public and his own government that will make it hard to launch a unilateral strike any time soon.
Possibly seeking to soften the edge with Washington, Netanyahu said he appreciated the president’s assurances that Iran would not be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon. But Netanyahu, whose persistent “red line” demands have infuriated U.S. officials, again made clear that was not enough.
“I think a red line, in this case, works to reduce the chances of the need for military action,” he told NBC.
MOVING RAPIDLY
MOVING RAPIDLY
In his most specific comments on Iran and its nuclear work, Netanyahu told CNN: “They’re moving very rapidly to completing the enrichment of the uranium that they need to produce a nuclear bomb. In six months or so they’ll be 90 percent of the way there.”
He appeared to be referring to Iran’s enrichment of uranium to 20 percent purity, a level it says is required for medical isotopes but which also is close to bomb-fuel grade. According to an August report by U.N. inspectors, Iran has stockpiled 91.4 kg of the 20 percent material.
Experts say about 200-250 kg (440-550 pounds) would be the minimum required to enrich further into enough material for a bomb, a threshold Iran could potentially reach soon by producing roughly 15 kg (33 pounds) a month, a rate that could be speeded up if it activates new uranium centrifuges.
Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak has warned that Iran may be approaching a “zone of immunity” in which Israeli bombs would be unable to penetrate buried facilities. The United States has more potent weapons that could do the job.
Israel’s concern is that Iran be prevented from reaching nuclear weapons capability, not just from developing an actual device, and they worry time is running out. Israel is widely believed to possess the Middle East’s only nuclear arsenal.
Deputy Prime Minister Dan Meridor told Israel Radio the United States should not wait for Iran to decide on building a bomb before it considers military action.
Netanyahu did not repeat his harsh comments of last week that Washington had lost any “moral right” to restrain Israel because it had refused to put strict U.S. limits on Tehran.
That was followed by word that Obama would not meet Netanyahu during the Israeli leader’s U.S. visit later this month to address the United Nations – widely viewed as a snub.
Netanyahu played down the matter on Sunday, saying “our schedules on this visit didn’t work out.”
He also denied he was meddling in U.S. electoral politics to boost Romney, a fellow conservative.
He also denied he was meddling in U.S. electoral politics to boost Romney, a fellow conservative.
Asked whether he agreed with Romney’s assertion that Obama was “throwing Israel under the bus,” Netanyahu said: “The only bus that is really important is the Iranian nuclear bus. That’s the one that we have to derail.”
(Writing by Dan Williams; Editing by David Brunnstrom and Bill Trott)
EXPLORE RELATED CONTENT
(Writing by Dan Williams; Editing by David Brunnstrom and Bill Trott)
EXPLORE RELATED CONTENT
———-
No comments:
Post a Comment