Monday, 18 June 2018

MUSLIMS INBREEDING FEEDBACK ON SENNELS AND FISCHER RESEARCH APPEARANCES IN BLOGS Posted on November 20, 2011


ORIGINATING Source: https://be4gen.wordpress.com/2011/11/20/muslims-inbreeding-feedback-on-sennels-and-fischer-research-appearances-in-blogs/

MUSLIMS INBREEDING FEEDBACK ON SENNELS AND FISCHER RESEARCH APPEARANCES IN BLOGS

Posted on November 20, 2011by 
MUSLIMS INBREEDING FEEDBACK
ON SENNELS AND FISCHER RESEARCH APPEARANCES IN BLOGS
The cloud of Genetic Distance and Genetic Identity are embracing the futuristic thematic of human evolution by genetic prescription at large. The right now certain researchers are focussing by genetic probing on narrow theme of specific faiths on dedicated surroundings. The proxy exercise is nothing better than scratching the problem surface realistic causes of mental deterioration. In doing so apparently they are traversing in bottom up fashion from low end hypotheses to root, say, Genetic Identity and Genetic Distance, in backward chaining (road map) by brute force. Rather, the ultimate objective of data warehousing of Genetic Identity may serve more gainfully at a wider scenario of manpower planning and grooming of incoming human generations.
Logistics of Feedback:This run down of the Action Research Forum is posted as feedback on blog:  https://be4gen.wordpress.com/2011/11/20/muslims-inbreeding-feedback-on-sennels-and-fischer-research-appearances-in-blogs/ responding to Nicolai Sennels, Bryan Fischer and others’ research appearances and commentary especially appeared in the issues of ‘Right Side News Daily Newsletter’. The Forum is open to receive opinions on their blog link in Comments.
This feedback study is carried out by this Action Research Forum by a group of professionals, peculiarly probing at large the academic of generalized conclusions vigilant to `KNOW` the affirmations for the knowledge associated by the notion of self ‘I’;
`I`; Often, Primitive societies boom on first person `I` (see note below *) an expression of possessiveness. Frequently, their creative imagination is used for emphasizing degree of correctness in contrast with permissive mindset as a reason based acceptability.
* [ A person is composed of many `I`s; the child `I`, the sports `I`, the shy `I`, the loveable `I`, the decision making `I`, intellectual `I `, and many more. There is also an inner `I`, a core of unchangeable `I` one `itself`. These make up individuals personality. ]
STRUCTURALLY, this rundown on Muslims Inbreeding Feedback is an endeavour of the Action Research Forum, and is classified into three classes expressed as under;
1). PRAGMATIC SCRUTINY; panoramic view of perspective of the Nicolai Sennels Essay based on stipulated inference with subjective generalizations as conclusions.
2). POINT-TO-POINT FEEDBACK; on Bryan Fischer-Focal Point, A huge Muslim problem: Inbreeding; the underlying subject matter on all sides of criticism.
3). CONCLUSIVE MEMORANDUM; Mining the crux of hindsight subject.
These captions are illustrated one by one underneath;
1). PRAGMATIC SCRUTINY; In Response of researchers` conclusions.
PREAMBLE;
The broader classification of this feedback model is recognition of two basic types of thought process of critics on ‘Muslims Inbreeding’. It is observed that the original deliberation of critics’ object oriented paradigm is comprised of Analogies and StatisticalInference for swift jumping to detrimental conclusions of likeliness matching with surroundings, at the expense of fairness of academic/ logical positivism.
Overall the crux of Analogies/ Syllogism in reasoning comprises weak logical forms of deductive engine of similarity or dissimilarity of objects’ classics and vice versa and hardly stands for robust derivations of Propositional Truth in wider scenario. Since the rapid growth of Science is proclaiming assertions on certain premises one day and the next day they are nullified by the counter research on premises of variant derivatives, thus on temporal life cycle. As such there are enormous illustrations, not worth repeating here.
Regarding the word Statistics, ‘the Statistics it is synonym of Lies, Damned Lieand Statistics a form of deception (*a, reference).’ So the imperative long lasting conclusions derived on the vehicle of Statistics are weak to sustain, which are temporally factual but not robust as Propositions on free time scale. In classical terms the researcher derivations are mixed in Specialization and Generalization of truth, which is trapped amidst confusions a domino of truth trail with overwhelmed prospective of culturally locked thought process. In critics’ paradigm, the knowledge extract of propositional truth is low end professional practice which does not qualify for spatial wrapping up, say; it is at the expense of virtues of aliens’ cultural goodness.
(*a) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lies,_damned_lies,_and_statistics
…. the 19th-century British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli (1804–1881): “There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.”
FEEDBACK INTENT
The objective of this feedback is to delve and evaluate praiseworthy researchers’ stipulated judicious conclusions’ modality and degree of fairness of projections. Nevertheless, inflicting upon variant aliens’ culture, tradition, life style coercion, economic dynamics, apprehension and insurance of ordeals, and family solidarity significance emerged over the long course of social development by means of; matrimonial alliances for stratified close knit, localized or generalized inter and intra castes, and faiths interactions.
Western Media; Normally, it is practice of western media/ intelligentsia proclaim the aliens’ insight from remote and imagery authorization by virtue of their tunnel implications and whims. Often, their engine of conclusions is induction dreaming (like robot without intuition). Although, they had least perception of first hand ground reality observations of aliens’ social and faith practices and issues. Thus, their paradigm depends on instant webs surfing of variant contextual themes or on hearsay that are not bona fide. On the contrary, some ancient adventurism like Alexander (300 BC), Lawrence of Arabia (last century) and many others who exposed themselves on aliens land for first hand perceptions, but in this case the researcher seems confined to self for generalized inference. Illustratively see below;
Overwhelmingly, the American think-tanks are champion of Afghan’s history and culture and formulate fictitious hollow reactions to Afghans’ bloodline. The fact is that common American learnt first time the sound ‘Kabul’, when it was cruised by Bush missiles. For the last ten years, the Afghans are prey of fatal violence of out-breeds (in terms of critics) which is unprecedented, but inbreeding thematic is claiming the racial superiority. Furthermore, inbreed Afghans contributed in build up of Australia under the banner of the than occupant forces, see link; https://be4gen.wordpress.com/2011/04/13/ghan-towns-of-australia-and-pakistan-vs-racial-discrimination-and-human-trafficking%E2%80%93-conjectural-model/
Non-judicial political scoring: Besides, the referees of ‘Muslims Inbreeding’ authoring are also groomed in similar analogous prejudices that approved the distorted rundown as research findings on non-judicial/ political scoring and propagating sectarianism on alibi of social research on narrow band for probing and generalizing without authenticity.
Pre-set Scope of Inbreeding: Whatever the scope of inbreeding is set by the researchers, it stands on tiny personnel exposure(s) in auxiliary capacity of medical practitioner of certain alien residents in Holland and came in contact with persons of variant context, not pertinent to the indicated caption of quoted research. Hence, the statistical design for the quoted inference pertain dubious legitimacy.
Research Instrument: Had the research instrument been selective of more entrenched prescribed methodology at synopsis level? The Action Research could be a vigorous choice unless otherwise ignored on evaluation for appropriation. Some of the extracts on Action Research (*b) below are quoted for ready reference;
(*b) Action Research; as designers and stakeholders, researchers work with others to propose a new course of action to help their community improve its work practices (Center for Collaborative Action Research). Kurt Lewin, then a professor at MIT, first coined the term “action research” in about 1944.
QUOTE; In his 1946 paper a professor of MIT described “Action Research and Minority Problems” as a comparative research on the conditions and effects of various forms of social action and research leading to social action that uses spiral of steps, each of which is composed of a circle of planning, action, and fact-finding about the result of the action”. QUOTE END
Pros and Cons: So much so, the critics of Muslims Inbreeding practices developed their case on precise tunnel view of the pros and nullifying the cons of significance of faith oriented marriage alliances on short samples of targeted minority which is all together non-representatives for generalized inference as deemed. Across the board, to accept or reject such an amplified assertion by statistical inference would not be convincing without comprehensive sequential designs of experiments with predetermined degrees of confidence. However, the researcher is amused to jump over to specific assertions and recommending to national policy makers to check Muslims Immigration because his personal experience and whims demands so. That is like pretending radicalization for generalization for world over.
Core Facts; underneath dissemination certain core facts have been unearthed which are vital to counter such a superficial and impulsive conclusions derived by the researchers.
Propositional Truth of Human Reproduction; Although, faiths apparently are least significant in the premises of laws of human reproduction while the critics’ judicial pretentions are in contrast insistence of Propositional truth and locked in likeminded shell by superior race club (proclaiming affirmation of weakness of I. Q levels if their prescriptions are ignored – brain washing slogan). The critics idealism is opening a Pandora box for prescribing ‘right-to-reproduce’ for manifested attributes of engineered human factory on order such as; martial races, intellectuals, barbarian, typical labour skills, super IQ babies, many more, and so ‘right-to-live‘ is question mark – but arrogance is obvious.
Critically, modeling the human genetic-distance and genetic-identity (blood line), is evolution of upside down tree traversing as such parents genetics provokes a child. Traditionally, it is accomplished by means of formulating hierarchy or network by marriage alliances of living human. However, the human history reads Pharaonic dynasties marrying real brother sister a symbolic practice of bloodline purity as they thought about. While in some polytheist faith (Hindu Dharma) which proposes goddess and god SITA and RAM were real sister and brother see the link; (http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/india/2011/10/111019_ramayana_epic_essay_gel_sz.shtml).
Adam & Eve (PBUH) mankind parents: Subsequently, the bloodlines had no external random inductions into human genetic-identity (race) since the mankind parents. The critic researchers have not pointed out any diversity of genetic identity even in general or with respect to faith (Islam), perhaps least likelihood. It is still by natural reproduction of child with natural characteristics generation after generation. Thus, where the degeneration of human I.Q inculcated as the critics are talking about, on default rationality may be I.Q influenced by worldly optimised grooming as creative toddlers.
Propositional Truth: A propositional truth of faiths is the human race evolution by natural reproduction. Their Genetic Identity (as origin) in multivariate combination traversed within descendants family trees all the way through reproduction natural system irrespective of faiths; per se human bloodline. So far nothing is specific as authentic about individual occurrence of child in siblings’ as a calculative prediction or otherwise. Presumably, the critic has wrapped around diversified versions of bloodline and I.Q, astonishingly, pathetic analogy. Whether rationally or whimsically, the inbreeding process has impacted upon in specific scenario of faith (Islam) child, only – figment of emotional imagination?
Probabilistically ‘the additive law on human annihilation’, if inbreeding had been effective so for over 1400 years the researcher would have not found the community in question around him, even Gypsy close knit community in Europe still flourishing, link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romani_people . The entrants of the researcher study were immigrants of post colonial days, by human trafficking and bonded slavery on need basis which is by now passed through the transition to new life style. Whether, the prevailed illusion focused the research can be fixed by retrospective corrective actions of the immigration lacuna is noteworthy- liking indulging in fallacy?
Diversity of alien demography in Research: The researcher has not duly accounted for diversity aspects of alien population under study by; joint family cultures, obligations of marriages, inheritance effects, family ties and coercion, live-ware corporate resource for economic competitive, in state-of-the art man made aggressions (nukes, drones, WMD, epidemics and disasters), wildcard the community structure by certain marriage system and marriages debt. See the link: http://www.cousincouples.com/?page=facts, which has discoursed exclusively.
Siblings’ Marriages: The scientific research probing of hypothetical assertions are still gray on confidence level; these wedding contracts are in practice in various cultures and communities? As such, certain monotheist temples/ clergy have imposed bar on such marriage registration, if declared. At large, no such authentic family trees are in use for wedding alliance and no manifested gadgets in use to certify the siblings genetically. The critic data evidence is dubious for generalization. The Researchers have frequently used Syllogism for deduction (see underneath).
Syllogism: (Encarta Dictionary); A subtle piece of reasoning, or one that seems true but is actually false or deceptive. By http://www.thefreedictionary.com/syllogism; Logic form of deductive reasoning consisting of a major premise, and a conclusion.
Illustrations;
(1). All humans are mortal, the major premise, I am a human, the minor premise, therefore, I am mortal, the conclusion.
(2). Some men are athletes, some athletes are women, therefore, some men are women.
(3). Novice (Nun/ Sister): ‘apostolnik’ (see underneath) or a black scarf tied over the head is not infuriating but Marwa (*) was brutally stabbed in a court.
LIVING IN DENIAL; THE TRAGIC MURDER OF MARWA EL-SHERBINI. To good extent it is a consequence to instigation theories of proxy research. See;
http://muslimahmediawatch.org/2009/07/living-in-denial-the-tragic-murder-of-marwa-el-sherbini/
(*) http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/apostolnik cloth veil that completely covers the head (except face), neck and shoulders worn by Orthodox Christians and Eastern Catholic Nuns, similar to ‘hijab’ worm by Muslim Women.
Evil Assertions: The critics’ paradigm of over simplification of a complex issue wrapped around in faith prejudices is fictitious scratching of emotions and is illusive. Illustratively, if one asks, Afghan about West, his abrupt response would voice – nothing but destructive force to Afghans, which is more fond of pats than human (Afghans). See link; http://ca.news.yahoo.com/cow-lovers-plot-letter-campaign-against-quebec-cops-184845635.html ,as routine. Whether it is genetic characteristic of inhumanity (color, caste, faith..) to inferiors logical positivism?
A precursor of global racial segregation; straightforwardly, this Action Research forum regards the critics attempt a precursor of global racial segregation in order to pervert heart and mind for radicalized social instigation. Emotions delicacy concern Intellectual freedom (…right to freedom of thought and expression of thought, as defined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, …) for certain people more than others. In certain cases, heartening the faith originates over reactions see link; http://muslimahmediawatch.org/2009/07/living-in-denial-the-tragic-murder-of-marwa-el-sherbini/. As a core the evil assertions insisted in critics’ inferences are injudicious, may nip apartheid intuitively, to many readers.
The Indian subcontinent and entire Asia historically faced uncountable aggressions, as old as the Alexander days in search of wealth and prosperity even Danish were not behind in rat race of the colonization vicious cruelties. As strategic integration, many adventurers settled down in South East and later on popped up in mixed bloodline but Europeans stood alone cautiously avoiding racial mix up. On need basis, they practised racial Human Trafficking on the cost of human rights norms, see link;
https://be4gen.wordpress.com/2011/04/13/ghan-towns-of-australia-and-pakistan-vs-racial-discrimination-and-human-trafficking%E2%80%93-conjectural-model/
In the researchers’ study domain there are apprehensions on closely knit races/ groups but those are comparatively insignificant (less vital) to European communities, accordingly their share of physical and virtual limitations of social practices, but inbreeding is customary.
Popping of human development opportunities; Overwhelmingly the researcher has concluded marriage alliances as an obstacle in purification of race versus mental health. The low I.Q is the subject of offspring to his wisdom is due to prevailed marriage alliances just out-of-the-blue comparing interfaith environmentalism, and fabricating theoretical assertions without pre-hypotheses thesis, a figment theme. Had it been so, by inbreeding of brutal and bad boys will be reproduced by similar parents. Remember, there was a time when Blacks, were thought more appropriate for slavery by White masters. As soon as the human development opportunities bursting, notice most powerful man of US currently. The feudalist free will theories of whites intelligence superiority is strained, postnatal grooming is more fundamental.
Polarization of faiths: Researcher is mostly navigating in ‘DO-NOT-KNOW’ domain that is beyond logical algebra, but taking it as affirmation ‘KNOW’ domain; to apply principle of inductions and generalizations. The deduction of certain factual truth, to favour certain prejudicial themes of superiority of race and culture, i.e. nothing but polarization of faith is at the expense of logical synchronization. Superiority of Race and Culture is the outcome of feudalistic arrogance.
Fears of Cousin Marriages: Sennels’ discourse suggests, ‘Muslims gene pool including extensive damage to its intelligence, sanity, and health. British Pakistani family is more than 13 times as likely to have children with recessive genetic disorders.’
[Such a disguised generalization is a precedence of projection on weak evidence and needs re-confirmation, if fear of cousins is assumed to be true the entire working population of Muslim world would have wiped out. link: http://www.cousincouples.com/?page=facts]
Sennels’ discourse apartheid mindset disseminates, ‘Negative consequences of inbreeding include a 100 percent increase in the risk of stillbirths and a 50% increase in the possibility that a child will die during labor. The research portrays ‘that children of consanguineous marriages lose 10-16 points off their IQ and that social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies.’                                                                                        [Significance of slow growth of IQ, if so, needs closer realistic examination of multivariate complexities, and is not based on any standalone factor as proclaimed on whims. The W.H.O provides worldwide Statistics of various multivariate factors in this respect and alerts. In the ‘DO-NOT-KNOW’ domain the researcher fabrications of biased conclusions is a concern targeting a faith-emotional perception of west contributing to apartheid mindset.
The potential factor of efficient grooming and education deficit over 1400 years may have caused axiomatic gap, see the link; http://sunedu.wordpress.com/2008/11/08/fearsome-past-of-faith-and-scientific-research-mindsets-how-future/ , http://www.cousincouples.com/?page=facts]
Further the discourse Points I.Q lower than 70: ‘The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as “retarded,” increases by an astonishing 400 percent among children of cousin marriages.’
[The researcher should have added the predicate his findings of that particular population instead of generalizing at faith. See the link;http://sunedu.wordpress.com/2010/09/17/toddler%E2%80%99s-creative-wisdom/]
Further, ‘In Denmark non-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent, more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army.’
[Notice Afghans (inbreed genes) verses Allies (superior genes) since 1970 one after another successfully rebuking occupant forces and dismantling empires.]
“The ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking is simply lower in the Islamic world.”
The researcher might have authentic knowledge of demographic multivariate model which may control diversity of DNA and faith dimensions- applicable to this conclusion, not yet published.]
2). POINT TO POINT FEEDBACK; Bryan Fischer-Focal Point – A huge Muslim problem: Inbreeding;
Note: Underneath Italic is used for the feedback along with authors’ dissemination point-to-point in, discourse links: NICOLAI SENNELS; http://www.rightsidenews.com/2010081111313/life-and-science/culture-wars/muslim-inbreeding-impacts-on-intelligence-sanity-health-and-society.html , and BRYAN FISCHER; http://www.afa.net/Blogs/BlogPost.aspx?id=2147498193.
‘Nicolai Sennels is a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into a little-known problem in the Muslim world: the disastrous results of Muslim inbreeding brought about by the marriage of first-cousins.’
[Unqualified claims for muscle building -The researcher has derived leapt out conclusive assertions on weak evidence.]
‘This practice, which has been prohibited in the Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of Prophet Moses (PBUH), was sanctioned by Prophet Muhammad(PBUH) and has been going on now for 50 generations (1,400 years) in the Muslim world.’
[Cousins are not included in the lists of prohibited relatives provided in the Bible, specifically in the books of Leviticus and Deuteronomy. The Old Testament also contains several examples of married cousins. Two of the most famous are prominent in Genesis. Isaac was married to Rebekah, his first cousin once removed (Genesis 24:12–15). Also, Rachel and Leah were both cousins of Isaac’s son Jacob. Jacob loved Rachel and worked seven years for her father Laban in return for permission to marry (Genesis 28–29). Link; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin_marriage#Judaism_and_Christianity , contradictions are obvious]
‘This practice of inbreeding will never go away in the Muslim world, since Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is the ultimate example and authority on all matters, including marriage.’
[The researcher is undermining propositional truth by inaccurate semantics and is besieged in false analogies and attempting to say; “Now Sun should rise from west”.]
‘The massive inbreeding in Muslim culture may well have done virtually irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool, including extensive damage to its intelligence, sanity, and health.’
[Fictitious Imagination with no authenticity]
‘According to Sennels, close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred. In Pakistan, the numbers approach 70%. Even in England, more than half of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins, and in Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%.’
[Researchers radicalism thinks complete annihilation of faith (Islam) by now – a foreseeing false imagination to quench intent, negative intellectualism]
‘The numbers are equally devastating in other important Muslim countries: 67% in Saudi Arabia, 64% in Jordan, and Kuwait, 63% in Sudan, 60% in Iraq, and 54% in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar.’
[Prejudicial Paranoia]
‘According to the BBC, this Pakistani, Muslim-inspired inbreeding is thought to explain the probability that a British Pakistani family is more than 13 times as likely to have children with recessive genetic disorders. While Pakistanis are responsible for three percent of the births in the UK, they account for 33% of children with genetic birth defects.’
[Syllogistic Generalization to fallacy]
The risk of what are called autosomal recessive disorders such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher and the risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher.
[Mystical computation – researchers’ vicious dreaming; 
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/autosomal; References in periodicals archive00 Hardcover Medical intelligence unit RC607 Nineteen international researchers contribute 11 chapters reporting the latest findings on ataxia telangiectasia (AT), an incurable, rare autosomal recessive genetic disorder affecting approximately one in 40,000-100,000 people.]
‘Other negative consequences of inbreeding include a 100 percent increase in the risk of Stillbirths and a 50% increase in the possibility that a child will die during labor.’
[No notified authenticity]
‘Lowered intellectual capacity is another devastating consequence of Muslim marriage patterns. According to Sennels, research shows that children of consanguineous marriages lose 10-16 points off their IQ and that social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies.’
[No reference- while the real cause is education and grooming after birth see references below;
‘The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as “retarded,” increases by an astonishing 400 percent among children of cousin marriages.’
[Attempt for brain washing for out numbering – proclaiming false superiority]
‘In Denmark, non-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army.’
[In multivariate statistical scenario this is not significant to Inbreeding of specific faith. For comparative study, the researchers have ignored other communities, say, European Gypsies and Internal Displaced Persons and others of similar strata, why discounted.]
‘Sennels says that “the ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking is simply lower in the Islamic world.” He points out that the Arab world translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone does.’
[ http://sunedu.wordpress.com/2008/11/08/fearsome-past-of-faith-and-scientific-research-mindsets-how-future/ may be due to educational priorities and cultural perspectives.]
‘In the last 1,200 years of Islam, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain does in a single year. Seven out of 10 Turks have never even read a book.’
[If one observes the pre-Islamic days Statistics to this effect which was not so desired in Arab Culture and so in post Islamic. As pointed above in the multivariate scenario this is not specific to faith (Islam) and irrelevantly associated with faith Inbreeding which is used as slogan for polarized consciousness of historical outcomes, better traverse history of educational priorities in competing strata.]
‘Sennels points out the difficulties this creates for Muslims seeking to succeed in the West. “A lower IQ, together with a religion that denounces critical thinking, surely makes it harder for many Muslims to have success in our high-tech knowledge societies.”
Only nine Muslims have every won the Nobel Prize, and five of those were for the “Peace Prize.” According to Nature magazine, Muslim countries produce just 10 percent of the world average when it comes to scientific research (measured by articles per million inhabitants).’
[It is nothing to do to faith specific inbreeding, many other constituent factors including participative agencies and examining criterions are involved, concerning transparency of the system. However the indicator above noted is simply overwhelmed westernization and not effective to faith stratum.]
‘In Denmark, Sennels’ native country, Muslim children are grossly overrepresented among children with special needs. One-third of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education, and anywhere from 51% to 70% of retarded children with physical handicaps in Copenhagen have an immigrant background.’
[There must be some hindsight behind this awards to under privileged groups of the inconsistencies of that society, or consequence of their wrong doing in overseas colonial past. Weak projections portraying author’s bent of mind]
‘Learning ability is severely affected as well. Studies indicated that 64% of school children with Arabic parents are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. The immigrant drop-out rate in Danish high schools is twice that of the native-born.’
[Same feedback as for last paragraph contributing to polarized consciousness.]
‘Mental illness is also a product. The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of
Schizophrenic illness. The increased risk of insanity may explain why more than 40% of the patients in Denmark’s biggest ward for clinically insane criminals have an immigrant background.’
[ See links; http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/mh-sm/pubs/schizophrenia-schizophrenie/chpt02-eng.php, http://www.schizophrenia.com/, http://www.google.ca/#pq=schizophrenic+illness+statistics&hl=en&sugexp=kjrmc&cp=25&gs_id=z&xhr=t&q=schizophrenic+illness+WHO&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&source=hp&pbx=1&oq=schizophrenic+illness+WHO&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=&gs_upl=&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=135c0148e947d7b5&biw=1280&bih=598,and W.H.O reports on mental order illness portrays different picture on the contrary of researcher imaginative pointing finger. In multivariate scenario this is not significant to the Muslim Inbreeding- may concern to polarized consciousness.]
‘The U.S. is not immune. According to Sennels, “One study based on 300,000 Americans shows that the majority of Muslims in the USA have a lower income, are less educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole.”’
[It has nothing to do with faith, rather anomaly of economic homogeneity. The reference is not qualified to authenticity.]
‘Sennels concludes:’
‘There is no doubt that the wide spread tradition of first cousin marriages among Muslims has harmed the gene pool among Muslims. Because Muslims’ religious beliefs prohibit marrying non-Muslims and thus prevents them from adding fresh genetic material to their population, the genetic damage done to their gene pool since their prophet allowed first cousin marriages 1,400 years ago are most likely massive. (This has produced) overwhelming direct and indirect human and societal consequences.’
[The above noted dissemination has no authenticity; the researcher thinking is subjected with rationality deficit where he is beginning with assumed tautology which is absolute fallacy to the basic facts of faith and human breeding. As such there are multiple versions of holy books of monotheist faiths except one faith (Quran). But, over and above theme is, all assertions and hypothesis of researcher are deducted from the unique parent of mankind – so contradicts to its own reference.]
‘Bottom line: Islam is not simply a benign and morally equivalent alternative to the Judeo-Christian tradition. As Sennels points out, the first and biggest victims of Islam are Muslims. Simple Christian compassion for Muslims and a common-sense desire to protect Western civilization must not result into a vigorous opposition to the spread of Islam. These stark realities must be taken into account when we establish public policies dealing with immigration from Muslim countries.’
[The logical recursion of false pretext that “Simple Christian compassion for Muslims…” the researcher is pretending in the interest of faith (Islam), is deceptive and baseless because the pretext semantics is in-loop racial superiority; “touching the nose round the neck”. However, during the WWII scenario Judeo-Christian versus Islam were non-significant rivals while intra Judeo-Christian mindset was imperative stream. AT this point and time, the so called inculcated bloodline inbreeding which cannot be reversed, until otherwise all is redone for researchers’ desired legacy vicious planning. Behind the “stark realities…” researcher perception is after-the-de-facto economic slavery is a denial of citizens’ equal rights.]
3). CONCLUSIVE MEMORANDUM; Mining the Crux of Issue.
Researcher extra-ordinary misguidance; The above discourse is exclusively in right of defence to faith inbreeding critics, nonetheless it is not ensuring completeness of a faith (Islam or else) arguments or deliberation regarding the matrimonial alliances on ground reality and norms; cultural, traditional, and morality by practice. In such cases, the faiths sermons generally prescribe guidelines (boundary-values of kin and count) of morality and over and above are the cultural norms and continued practices even from pre-faith (Islam or else) days, reckoning is for the breech of boundary-value if prescribed. The cross-cousins or parallel-cousins marriage alliance is not hard and fast customary or manifestation by faith (Islam) where the researcher is focussing, it is one of the options for match making by family seniors. However in this case the researchers’ extraordinary misguiding mixes and diversified pointing to hindsight objectivity on alibi inbreed and outbreed which is not a confirmed concern for recessive genetic disorder.
The issue is recessive genetic disorder a biological characteristics- why? The researcher wishes to impose their apprehensions of uncertainties, although nothing about brood health order is for sure. However the recessive disorder will continue unless otherwise medical research unveils the real facts about it, faith (Islam) does not prohibit such acceptability and absorption in cultural practices in order to abandon as front line victim of it likewise other precautionary health measures.
Diverting the crux of the issue; Since the days of ancient Greeks School there was institutional approach on knowledge engines and have contested with the than clergy. The faith (Islam) is rendering guidance for promotion of knowledge by sermons. However, some researchers are taking advantages of their authorship by radical criticism by promoting logical negativism against faith (Islam), via legacy of axiomatic racist superiority in the name of freedom of expression (see underneath). Under the captions of previous posts by or about Nicolai Sennels’ posted during 2010 (underneath), and unconsciously diverting the crux of the issue.
[ http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2010/08/islam-and-inbreeding.htmlhttp://www.rightsidenews.com/2010081111313/life-and-science/culture-wars/muslim-inbreeding-impacts-on-intelligence-sanity-health-and-society.html ]
BEHIND THE COUSINS MARRIAGES;
Certain societies culturally prefer kin including cross-cousins, or parallel-cousins for matrimonial alliance by customary or otherwise, because of considerations like – pride of lineage and notions of purity of blood; family solidarity; ease of handling of post marriage stresses and the customary of dowry given to the daughter for wedding establishment instead of to aliens. Latest see the link; http://ca.shine.yahoo.com/sister-wives–woman-marries-sister-s-husband-to-honour-her-final-request.htmlhttps://be4gen.wordpress.com/2011/11/21/sister-wives-woman-marries-sisters-husband-to-honour-her-final-request/
Specific to Christianity practices by scriptures; see link and extract below; http://e.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin_marriage#Judaism_and_Christianity
Cousins are not included in the lists of prohibited relatives provided in the Bible, specifically in the books of Leviticus and Deuteronomy. The Old Testament also contains several examples of married cousins. Two of the most famous are prominent in Genesis. Isaac was married to Rebekah, his first cousin once removed (Genesis 24:12–15). Also, Rachel and Leah were both cousins of Isaac’s son Jacob. Jacob loved Rachel and worked seven years for her father Laban in return for permission to marry (Genesis 28–29).
Mormons (Christian Cult) regarding matrimonial alliance: link; http://www.cousincouples.com/?page=facts
Facts About Cousin Marriages; Joseph and Mary first Cousins, see link; http://www.cousincouples.com/?page=facts
Perhaps, the matrimonial alliance is manifestation tautology in researchers’ theme thus the proclaimed scientific assertions that cross-cousins or parallel-cousins or elserelationships is damaging to human race are subjective. If ever thought inevitable to revisit/ examine these customary/ practices, the UNO related platform is there instead of racialist frame of mind propaganda in anticipation.
Noteworthy, this feedback is not expressed aggressing any faith in the name of freedom of expression like some westernized reactions crossing the boundaries, per see, emotions of reader(s) are under stress this Forum humbleness demands that may be discounted.
Core Team of Action Research Forum: Prof. S.A.K Lodhi (Forum Team Leader), Anonymous Veteran Combatant of Paranoia, H. Mir (Sr. Analyst), Ms. S. Nabi(Coordinator), and other illustrious participants. Contact: bombus.babylon&yahoo.com
Acknowledgements: Help rendered to enlighten the study by any source contributing in knowledge to this effect and peculiar webs.


Advertisements
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)