ORIGNIAL Source: https://be4gen.wordpress.com/2011/05/24/understanding-wide-spectrum-semantics-of-word-%E2%80%98supreme%E2%80%99-adj-adv-n/
UNDERSTANDING WIDE SPECTRUM SEMANTICS OF WORD ‘SUPREME’; adj, adv, n
UNDERSTANDING WIDE SPECTRUM SEMANTICS OF WORD ‘SUPREME’; adj, adv, n
(May 24, 2011)
This is for Action Research Forum rendering services for promotion of knowledge
This discourse of Supreme covers Basics, Conceptual, and Pragmatic facets.
BASICS of ‘SUPREME’
These days in Pakistan the word ‘Supreme’ is noisy in various contexts, a lot in ranks and files of hard and electronics media analysts, information mongers, authorities of state, governing executives, uniformed guardians and almost everybody who wish to use their rear chamber to express on dateline issues.
Coincidentally everybody flaps the word to their specific perception where the cohesiveness of it is often ambiguous to open end contexts. Those who employ the word and those who take it for granted are in inherited diversions. To intensify the semantics and common forms of ‘Supreme’, an attempt is made surfing thru linguistics and British Parliament glossary, where this was borrowed for structural strength of evolution of Parliamentary practices.
Linguistically words have syntax and semantics composed dynamically hand-in-hand, as per context. Thus, to take a word correctly one should perceive the context of use or talked about. Some Context free notions’ rapid review extracts are posted below. While in mathematical notions, the ‘context free’ refers concept which is often reflex ions (symbols) prescribed in Context Free Grammar.
Context- free grammar generating context-free language
o deterministic context-free grammar
o stochastic context-free grammar
o weighted context-free grammar
Context- free grammar generating context-free language
o deterministic context-free grammar
o stochastic context-free grammar
o weighted context-free grammar
At least, mounting to our specific needs about ‘Supreme’, let us begin;
‘SUPREME’
Referring: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/SUPREME
su•preme (s -pr m ) adj.
su•preme (s -pr m ) adj.
1. Greatest in power, authority, or rank; paramount or dominant.
2. Greatest in importance, degree, significance, character, or achievement.
3. Ultimate; final: the supreme sacrifice.
2. Greatest in importance, degree, significance, character, or achievement.
3. Ultimate; final: the supreme sacrifice.
From Latin suprēmus highest, from superus that is above from super quoted;
supremely adv
supremeness n
supreme – Ultimately from Latin supra, “above,” which began supremus, “highest.”
supremeness n
supreme – Ultimately from Latin supra, “above,” which began supremus, “highest.”
Supremeness (n); holding supreme authority
Supremacy (n); preeminence
Supremacy (n); preeminence
This is a background about the word ‘Supreme’ in generalized context. Now, focusing on pertinent word(s) Parliamentary Supremacy or Parliament Sovereignty which is frequently used by different quarters molding to their perceptions, may be they mean ‘holding supreme authority’.
What ‘holding supreme authority’ means in practical terms?
The evolution process encompassing ‘Parliament Sovereignty’ more precisely is continued by different parliaments interacting with fresh dimensions manifested by parliaments earlier. As a matter of fact, common semantics kernels of Sovereignty are adopted as working definitions after duly transcribing, editing, translating, confirming no contradictions and instituting with detailed accounts.
CONCEPTUAL PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY
More on Parliamentary sovereignty Links facilitating the mining;
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/parliamentray+sovereignty
http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/sovereignty/
http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/sovereignty/
Parliamentary sovereignty (also called the sovereignty of parliament, parliamentary supremacy, or legislative supremacy) is a concept in the constitutional law of some parliamentary democracies. Under parliamentary sovereignty, a legislative body has absolute sovereignty, meaning it is supreme to all other government institutions (including any executive or judicial bodies as they may exist). Furthermore, it implies that the legislative body may change or repeal any prior legislative acts. Parliamentary sovereignty contrasts with notions of judicial review, where a court may overturn unconstitutional legislation deemed oddity. Such specific instances of parliamentary sovereignty exist in the United Kingdom and New Zealand.
Parliamentary Sovereignty and the UK constitution
Parliamentary sovereignty is a principle and most important part of the UK constitution. It makes Parliament the supreme legal authority in the UK, which can create or end any law. Generally, the courts cannot overrule its legislation and no Parliament can pass laws that future Parliaments cannot change.
People often refer to the UK having an ‘unwritten constitution’ but that’s not strictly true. It may not exist in a single text, like in the USA or Germany, but large parts of it are written down, much of it in the laws passed in Parliament – known as statute law.
Parliamentary Sovereignty and the UK constitution
Parliamentary sovereignty is a principle and most important part of the UK constitution. It makes Parliament the supreme legal authority in the UK, which can create or end any law. Generally, the courts cannot overrule its legislation and no Parliament can pass laws that future Parliaments cannot change.
People often refer to the UK having an ‘unwritten constitution’ but that’s not strictly true. It may not exist in a single text, like in the USA or Germany, but large parts of it are written down, much of it in the laws passed in Parliament – known as statute law.
Therefore, the UK constitution is often described as ‘partly written and wholly uncodified’. (Uncodified means that the UK does not have a single, written constitution)
Developments Affecting Parliamentary Sovereignty
Over the years, Parliament has passed laws that limit the application of parliamentary sovereignty. These laws reflect political developments both within and outside the UK.
Developments Affecting Parliamentary Sovereignty
Over the years, Parliament has passed laws that limit the application of parliamentary sovereignty. These laws reflect political developments both within and outside the UK.
They include:
• The devolution of power to bodies like the Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly.
• The Human Rights Act 1998.
• The UK’s entry to the European Union in 1972.
• The decision to establish a UK Supreme Court in 2009, which ends the House of Lords function as the UK’s final court of appeal.
These developments do not fundamentally undermine the principle of parliamentary sovereignty, since, in theory at least, Parliament could repeal any of the laws implementing these changes.
United Kingdom
The doctrine of parliamentary supremacy may be summarized in three points:
• Parliament can make laws concerning anything.
• No Parliament can bind a future parliament (that is, it cannot pass a law that cannot be changed or reversed by a future Parliament).
• A valid Act of Parliament cannot be questioned by the court. Parliament is the supreme lawmaker.
• The devolution of power to bodies like the Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly.
• The Human Rights Act 1998.
• The UK’s entry to the European Union in 1972.
• The decision to establish a UK Supreme Court in 2009, which ends the House of Lords function as the UK’s final court of appeal.
These developments do not fundamentally undermine the principle of parliamentary sovereignty, since, in theory at least, Parliament could repeal any of the laws implementing these changes.
United Kingdom
The doctrine of parliamentary supremacy may be summarized in three points:
• Parliament can make laws concerning anything.
• No Parliament can bind a future parliament (that is, it cannot pass a law that cannot be changed or reversed by a future Parliament).
• A valid Act of Parliament cannot be questioned by the court. Parliament is the supreme lawmaker.
Pakistan Parliamentary Sovereignty;
• Pakistan Parliament these days is crunching terminologies about her Sovereignty designs which are in transition of maturity by; expression, semantics and linguistics standards. Filling this gap, the users are enjoying freedom of composing their assertions and pronouncing by them-selves variance of meaning for variety of audience whose perception is on far most priority. Inevitably, the role of Media is to groom viewers in global scenario instead the filling time slot by anchors by calling every Tom, Dick and Harry novices of the tort law disclaiming by denying responsibility.
• Organization is recognized by the people who represent that are also applicable on parliamentarians’ floor. Thus, apt acumen and qualifications are essential for parliamentary floor entry. Besides, right of voter and right of parliamentarian are significantly distinguished virtual entities to maintain legislation quality, else frequent knock out by the judiciary.
• Completeness; often refer physical security lapses, and so logical lapses are virtual, as intent. One needs accurate directions to proceed forward without roaming around in revisiting cycles. This needs visionary and roll model, to share knowledge and experiences of other parliamentary academies. Our custom designed Unilateralism and Feudalism will barricade integration with global communities and will inspire to repeat thought mindset of Abbottabad episode. Same is with TOR of the Parliament Proposed Commission as resolved on the floor.
• Right direction: Our parliamentary needs to maintain the supremacy may be pragmatic fit to crux of supreme authority, and adaptive to legislation in effect. This should essentially be implementing the floor intent in letter and spirit in deliverable oriented breakdowns while enabling cohesively their virtual and physical forms.
• Organization is recognized by the people who represent that are also applicable on parliamentarians’ floor. Thus, apt acumen and qualifications are essential for parliamentary floor entry. Besides, right of voter and right of parliamentarian are significantly distinguished virtual entities to maintain legislation quality, else frequent knock out by the judiciary.
• Completeness; often refer physical security lapses, and so logical lapses are virtual, as intent. One needs accurate directions to proceed forward without roaming around in revisiting cycles. This needs visionary and roll model, to share knowledge and experiences of other parliamentary academies. Our custom designed Unilateralism and Feudalism will barricade integration with global communities and will inspire to repeat thought mindset of Abbottabad episode. Same is with TOR of the Parliament Proposed Commission as resolved on the floor.
• Right direction: Our parliamentary needs to maintain the supremacy may be pragmatic fit to crux of supreme authority, and adaptive to legislation in effect. This should essentially be implementing the floor intent in letter and spirit in deliverable oriented breakdowns while enabling cohesively their virtual and physical forms.
PRAGMATIC – PARLIAMENTARY SUPREMACY
This stage is a real test of the enforced parliamentary sovereignty to go a long way in its evolution process of democratic supremacy by;
• Instrument to implement parliamentary supremacy; predefined completion in letter and spirit as end test of floor resolution. Parliamentary manuals should prescribe specific drill and steps and end tests index of quality and quantity. However, assessments used by British Parliament in specific terms may not be applicable on our floor which demands state-of the art knowledge and expertise. Our majority of parliamentarians have internet phobia, and do not expose their internet contacts even to their voters.
• Index of implementation: Accountability of supremacy is essential required in all events so required. The role of the proposed parliamentary commission (Abbottabad intrusion) is an evolving process to enhance parliamentary supremacy inline with the precedence of British Parliament.
• Index of implementation: Accountability of supremacy is essential required in all events so required. The role of the proposed parliamentary commission (Abbottabad intrusion) is an evolving process to enhance parliamentary supremacy inline with the precedence of British Parliament.
Disclaimer: Knowledge surfing instigators claim denial of responsibility whatsoever in this respect, these are their views how to look at it.
Advertisements
No comments:
Post a Comment